Objective: To observe the effect of regular rehabilitation intervention on post-stroke patients in community.

Methods: From January 2017 to June 2018, 60 post-stroke patients who met the selection criteria were recruited and divided into regular rehabilitation intervention group (n = 30) and non-regular rehabilitation intervention group (n = 30) used by random number table. The regular rehabilitation intervention group received outpatient rehabilitation intervention once a week, and the patients were instructed by the rehabilitation therapist to choose appropriate sports items for family self-rehabilitation training; the non-regular rehabilitation intervention group received outpatient rehabilitation intervention once for family self-random rehabilitation training. Fugl-Meyer Assessment, modified Barthel Index and Life Satisfaction Index-A were used to evaluate the motor function, activities of daily
living and quality of life before intervention (0 week) and after 12 weeks of rehabilitation intervention (12 weeks) and 12 weeks of follow-up self-rehabilitation training (24 weeks). 

Results: The motor function, activities of daily living and quality of life of the two groups after 12 weeks of rehabilitation intervention (12 weeks) and 12 weeks of follow-up selfrehabilitation training (24 weeks) were significantly better than those before intervention (0 week) (P < 0.05). After 12 weeks of rehabilitation intervention (12 weeks), the scores of Fugl-Meyer Assessment, modified Barthel Index and Life Satisfaction Index-A in the regular rehabilitation intervention group were 72.74+9.32, 75.98+8.71 and 12.93+1.75, respectively, and those in the non-regular rehabilitation intervention group were 61.89+8.56, 61.38+9.11, and 6.78+2.35, respectively. After 12 weeks of follow-up self-rehabilitation training (24 weeks), the scores of Fugl-Meyer Assessment, modified Barthel Index and Life Satisfaction Index-A of the regular rehabilitation intervention group were 81.59+8.54, 86.36+8.52 and 16.39+2.12, respectively, while those of the non-regular rehabilitation intervention group were 62.78+12.34, 63.13+13.37 and 8.54+4.51, respectively; the scores of the regular rehabilitation intervention group were significantly higher than those of the non-regular rehabilitation intervention group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Regular rehabilitation intervention can significantly improve the motor function, activities of daily living and quality of life of post-stroke patients in community, and shows good continuity effect, which is worthy of promotion and application in rehabilitation treatment of stroke in community.